Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Sanchez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 2009No. 166Published

1Dissent

Jones, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the orders of the Appellate Division. Both trial courts erred in not instructing the jury to make a finding that the persons who “aided” and were “actually present” had any degree of mental culpability. In my view, the gang assault statutes, sections 120.06 and 120.07 of the Penal Law, require that all members involved in the assault have the specific intent to cause physical injury—the lowest degree of mental culpability applicable to the crime of assault in any degree (see Penal Law art 120).

The gang assault statutes, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HedgemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Alweis v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. BeaudetNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. DennisNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API