Legal Opinion
United States v. Bi-Co Pavers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1984No. 83-1817PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Bi-Co Pavers, Inc. was found guilty of one count of bid rigging in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1 and three counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1342. On appeal, Bi-Co argues that: (1) various errors of the trial court confused the jury, thereby depriving Bi-Co of due process of law, (2) the trial court erred in denying Bi-Co’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, (3) the trial court erred in admitting extrinsic offense evidence, and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction on the bid rigging count. Finding no merit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Willie Albert Smith v. Lee Roy Black, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Patrick C. RichersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John E. McKenzie Dale Bonura and Stephen FarrarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Dynalectric Company Paxson Electric Company G.W. Walther Ewalt Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.