Legal Opinion

Bray-Robinson-Curry Woolen Mills v. W. F. Walker & Son

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

In November, 1912, thq ap-pellees were indebted to the appellant in the sum of $131 on account for merchandise purchased. Some time during that month the account was placed in the hands of Davis, Davis & Davis, attorneys at law, for collection, with instructions to file suit if it was not paid. On the 26th day of that month Davis, Davis & Davis mailed a verified statement of the account to P. H. Davis, a justice of the peace, at Teneha, in Shelby county, with directions to file the same for suit, and to issue citations immediately. They also inclosed with the account three typewritten copies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FossatiTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Heidenheimer Bros. v. BrentTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Henderson County v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeff Davis County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Austin v. BainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. State Amusement Co. v. Turrentine & ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1980
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API