Middaugh v. Wilson
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Wells Circuit Court; F. C. Vaughn, Judge. Action by Martha Middaugh against Bethilda Wilson and husband on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to complaint, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P. J.
A demurrer to the complaint of the appellant Martha Middaugh, against the appellees, Bethilda Wilson and John A. Wilson, her husband, for want of sufficient fact's was sustained. In the complaint it was shown that August 16, 1900, Jacob Busheé, father of the appellant, executed his warranty deed conveying to the appellee Bethilda certain land, and, as part of the transaction, and as part of the consideration of the deed and of the purchase money for the land, the appellee Bethilda executed her’ promissory note (made an exhibit) for $300, payable to *113the grantor six years after that' date. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- The Walter A. Wood Mowing v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Norris v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schaefer v. HinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Mattingly v. WheldenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Simmons v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Pilotte v. BrummettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.