Bliss v. California Cooperative Producers
California Supreme Court
1DissentTraynor, J.
I dissent.
In my opinion it is unnecessary to remand this case to the trial court for a finding on the question of notice, since the findings and the evidence show that plaintiffs took the notes without notice that the first installments had not been paid. Moreover, I do not understand by what reasoning my associates reach the conclusion that despite a finding that the transferee of an installment note acted in good faith and the fact that an inquiry would have revealed no defenses he cannot as a matter of law be a holder in due course if he acquires the note with notice of the nonpayment of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.