Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bliss v. California Cooperative Producers

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1947No. Sac. 5729Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent.

In my opinion it is unnecessary to remand this case to the trial court for a finding on the question of notice, since the findings and the evidence show that plaintiffs took the notes without notice that the first installments had not been paid. Moreover, I do not understand by what reasoning my associates reach the conclusion that despite a finding that the transferee of an installment note acted in good faith and the fact that an inquiry would have revealed no defenses he cannot as a matter of law be a holder in due course if he acquires the note with notice of the nonpayment of a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API