Legal Opinion

Jansson v. National Steamship Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1917No. Civ. No. 2129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco striking a notice of intention to move for a new trial from the "files of the court. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion to strike from the files of the court a notice of intention to move for a new trial served and filed by defendant, plaintiff’s motion being grounded upon the contention that the notice was not served or filed within the time provided by section 659 of the Code of Civil Procedure as it read at the time the motion was made.

As the result of the trial herein the plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant on or about the third day of February, 1915, for the sum of thrée thousand dollars. Thereafter, to wit, on the fifth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gardner v. StareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. Minnesota Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Caldwell v. GeldreichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Cowee v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Goetz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lopez v. CapitiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API