Harlan v. Ash
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cass District Coiwt. — Hoh. A. B. Ti-io'BNELLj Judge. Action to recover an amount alleged to be due on a promissory note. There was a trial by the court without the aid of a jury, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff:. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The note in suit was made on the seventeenth day of October, 1887, in favor of the Commercial Bank of Atlantic, for one hundred dollars, with interest thereon at ten per cent, per annum. It was signed by the defendants, J. B. Ash and 0. Slater. The payee was a partnership, of which the plaintiff, E. J. Dickerson, and R. Gr. Phelps were the partners. The defendants allege that the plaintiff is not the owner of the note, but that it belongs to the partnership, and that he has in his possession the sum of one hundred and thirty-four dollars, which belongs to Slater on account of money received…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Waters v. Cass County BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Simon Casady & Co. v. German Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Elzy ex rel. Farmers' Bank of Gays v. MorrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Scurry v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Hartwig v. IlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.