Legal Opinion
Arim v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1994No. Docket 145204, 145205, 147502, 148304, 154046PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals arise from a 1986 investigation, known as "Operation Shifty,” that was conducted by the Department of State’s (dos) Bureau of Automotive Regulation (bar) in conjunction with the Office of the Attorney General (oag) into fraudulent practices by transmission repair facilities pursuant to the Mo tor Vehicle Service and Repair Act (the Act), MCL 257.1301 et seq.; MSA 9.1720(1) et seq.
The bar and its director, Frederick Pirochta, and its mechanic, Walter Curtis, together with the oag, received the technical support and assistance of General Motors Corporation, Lucille…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Leahy v. Orion TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Keywell & Rosenfeld v. BithellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.