Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carmel v. Lunney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1986Published

1DissentLevine, J.

In my view, Special Term properly denied the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The majority holds that, so long as plaintiffs conviction based upon his guilty plea has not been vacated in a postconviction proceeding in the underlying criminal action on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, it stands as a conclusive bar to plaintiffs action. This follows, according to the majority, because the conviction negates proximate causation, or because it precludes plaintiff from showing that "he would have been successful in the underlying, criminal action if defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Vavolizza v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Parksville Mobile Modular, Inc. v. FabricantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. In re Samuel W.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API