Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Orange. Tried below before the Hon. Wm. Chambers.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

The indictment charges that the defendant, whilst he was the duly qualified and acting clerk of the District Court for Orange county, did “unlawfully acquire” from one Hebb, “the party interested,” certain jury scrip. It is evidently framed under article 1983, Paschal’s Digest, which makes it an offense for the “clerk or deputy clerk of any District or County Court, sheriff or his deputy, constable or coroner, or justice of the peace,” ‘ ‘ to purchase or otherwise acquire from the party interested any jury scrip or the fees coming to any witness,” the punishment being…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fleeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Parshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API