Legal Opinion
State v. Rainier National Park Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1937No. 26474. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
This action was instituted by the state of Washington for recovery of industrial insurance premiums and medical aid assessments, claimed to be due from the respondent, Rainier National Park Company, Inc., under the workmen’s compensation act, for the period between January 1, 1934, and December 1, 1935, on account of extrahazardous occupations conducted by the respondent wholly within the boundaries of Mount Rainier National Park.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to the second amended complaint, and, the state having declined to plead further, judgment was entered dismissing its action.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McGlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Arlington Hotel Co. v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Murray v. Joe Gerrick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Arlington Hotel Company v. FantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Murray v. Joe Gerrick & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Capetola v. Barclay White Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Dirt & Aggregate, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Capetola v. Barclay-White Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Mendoza v. Neudorfer Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Mendoza v. Neudorfer Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.