Legal Opinion

Davie v. Smoot

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1941No. 4-6296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

If on appeal lawsuits could be decided by weighing' the unsupported declarations of counsel for appellant against the defensive explanations of appellee’s legal aids, the case at bar would be less perplexing. If without a complete record, and in the absence of testimony, we could give to ex parte statements appearing in the briefs that degree of verity so earnestly contended for, a decision based upon merit might he possible in spite of the difficulty in deciding between conflicting avouchments; but more often the result would serve to emphasize and justify the rule that argument must be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wooten v. PenuelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Myers v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Loveless v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Harley v. OliverDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
  4. Gore v. Heartland Community BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API