Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pittman v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 6, 2009No. 2008-CA-00904-COAPublished

1DissentMyers, P.J.

¶ 20. The majority holds that the trial court erred in dismissing Troy Pittman’s motion for post-conviction collateral relief as being time-barred under Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-39-5(2) (Rev. 2007). For the reasons developed below, I believe the trial court was correct in dismissing Pittman’s motion for post-conviction collateral relief because it was filed after the three-year statute of limitation provided for in post-conviction relief matters. See id.

¶ 21. I begin by stating that I believe the majority’s reliance on Porter v. State, 963 So.2d 1225 (Miss.Ct.App.2007), is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puckett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hymes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Laushaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
  4. Mitchell v. Progressive Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API