Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Roberds

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1931No. 21089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, 0. J.

1. Where a railway company has a claim against A for storage charges only, it is a bailee for hire (Netzow Mfg. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co., 7 Ga. App. 163, 63 S. E. 399) ; and any sale by the railway company of the properly stored, for the purpose of obtaining pay for its storage charges, must be in conformity with the provisions of section 3366 of the Civil Code (1910). A sale of the property in accordance with the provisions of section 2757 of the Civil Code is an illegal sale and amounts to a conversion of the property by the railway company; and after such a sale, A Avould be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nalley v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Bush v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Netzow Manufacturing Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. National Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API