Legal Opinion

Southerland v. Davis Agent

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 1923No. 11121PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

The plaintiff, section foreman in the employ of the defendant, was injured while in the discharge of his duties, and thereafter brought this action against the defendant for the recovery of damages. From judgment on verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $5,790, the defendant appeals.

The exceptions, five in number, raise three points.

The first is grounded upon the refusal of the trial

Judge, Hon. I. W. Bowman, to charge:

“That, even if the jury find that the defendant company was guilty of negligence, yet, if they find that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Huggins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Bing v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Currie v. Davis, Agent, Etc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Crawford v. Charleston-Isle of Palms Traction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API