Legal Opinion

Jeansonne v. Cox

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 10, 1957No. 42997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

In this suit the plaintiffs seek a mandatary injunction to compel the defendants to fill or close a drainage ditch or canal and, in the alternative, to recover damages occasioned to their property by virtue of the construction of the ditch or canal. After trial there was judgment denying the mandatory injunction but awarding damages to the various plaintiffs in amounts ranging from $250 to $1,000. From this judgment, the defendants have appealed and the plaintiffs answered the appeal asking for the mandatory injunction originally prayed for, and, in the alternative, for an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Devoke v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. Guaranty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Beauvais v. DC Hall TransportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Roche v. St. RomainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Androwski v. Ole McDonald's Farms, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. LaCroix v. Travelers Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Stewart v. City of PinevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API