Pacifica L 51 LLC v. New Investments Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentBerzon, Circuit Judge
Neither 11 U.S.C. § 1123(d) nor any. other provision of the Bankruptcy Code provides a definition of “cure” contrary to the one this Court announced in Great Western Bank & Trust v. Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc. (In re Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc.), 850 F.2d 1338, 1340 (9th Cir. 1988). We are therefore bound by this Court’s precedent, according to which New Investments may, in curing its default, pay the pre-default interest rate contained in the promissory note.
Instead of abiding by our longstanding case law, the majority concludes that Congress displaced Entz-White when it passed §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo, Debtors. Elfriede Di Pierro v. Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo and Richard J. McCord Interim TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- General Construction Company Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp. v. Robert Castro Director, Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. Future Media Productions Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.