Legal Opinion

Lincoln Sav. Bank & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1897No. 769PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The record in this case is insufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment below on account of any of the alleged errors assigned. This was an action for the .conversion of certain promissory notes, in which the defendants in error alleged that they had a special property. The defense was that the plaintiff in error was the owner of these notes at the time of the alleged conversion, and that the defendants in error had no title or interest in them. There was a verdict and a judgment for the defendants in error. Thirty-six errors were assigned, hut counsel for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Jaffray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  2. Balliet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
  4. Jenson v. Toltec Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. Leeker v. MarcotteArizona Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API