Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. Pasquale

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided June 22, 1928No. 7Published

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.,

On the 10th day of last December, under and pursuant to the Act of the General Assembly approved the 27th day of March, 1923, P. L. 34, Frank X. Renninger, district attorney of this county, filed, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the plaintiff, a bill in equity praying, first, the grant of the rule upon Enrico Pasquaie, the first defendant, and Daniel Rastelli, the second defendant, to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue restraining until final hearing the continuance of a common nuisance pleaded in the bill; secondly, the issuance of an order…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Murphy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API