Legal Opinion · Dissent

Waggoner v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1923No. 2141Published

1DissentBoyce, J.

I respectfully dissent. The parol evidence rule applies only in controversies between parties to the instrument, and those claiming under them. Johnson v. Portwood, 89 Tex. 235, 34 S. W. 597 (7), 600, 787; Hughes v. Sandal, 25 Tex. 162; 22 C. J. pp. 1291-1294, and authorities; 10 R. C. L. p, 1020; 3 Jones on Evidence (Horwitz) § 434, p. 155. The creditors of the Burk-Waggoner Oil Company were not parties to the deed, and I doubt whether they claim under it so as to come within the terms of the rule stated. Johnson v. Portwood, supra. But, conceding that they are privies to the deed, appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hughes v. SandalTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Vander Stucken v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Godwin v. BanisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API