Legal Opinion

State v. Truelove

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 4, 1966No. 48324Published

1Opinion of the Court

In re: Robert L. Truelove and Fred H. Truelove applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. There are no perfected bills of exceptions. See LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606; State v. Green, 245 La. 1081, 162 So.2d 573; State v. Spivey, 247 La. 719, 174 So.2d 132; State v. Bradford, 247 La. 720, 174 So.2d 132; State v. Polland, 247 La. 721, 174 So. 2d 132; State v. Amos, 247 La. 721, 174 So. 2d 132. Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the recdrd.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. State v. AmosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  4. State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  5. State v. PollandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API