Legal Opinion
Raymond v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 8, 1930No. 13029Published
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The soundness of the opinion on the original hearing is challenged upon the ground that the indictment was bad for the reason that it failed to set out the written instrument. In the indictment found in the record it' appears that the appellant made certain verbal representations, among which are the following:
“* * * that said Emmet A. Jones, as President, had legal authority to execute binding contracts for said Corporation; that if said John H. Sedwick, W. R. Nail, W. G. Webb, John F. Sedwick, Thomas L. Blanton, Jr. and W. Graham Webb, Jr.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Luce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Kimbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890