Arthur v. Brick
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Judge.
Plaintiff buyers, Shannon Arthur and Renee Van Arsdale, appeal a district court ruling denying their petition seeking rescission, restitution, and damages arising out of a real estate contract.
Rescission and Restitution. The buyers’ rescission claim is an equitable claim on appeal. Our review of equity cases is de novo. Iowa R.App. P. 4. However, we give weight to the trial judge’s findings of fact. Qualley v. State Federal Sav. & Loan, 487 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Iowa App.1992).
On July 21, 1994, Van Arsdale and Arthur as buyers entered into a purchase agreement with James E. Brick as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Robinson v. Perpetual Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Holi-Rest, Inc. v. TreloarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Jensen v. SattlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Gouge v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
- McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.