Legal Opinion

Consolidated Goldacres Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 21, 1947No. Docket No. 9248Published

Petitioner, a Nevada corporation, entered into contracts for erection of mining machinery and plant. Title was retained by the seller until payment, in general dependent upon the amount of ore processed. Held, the contracts did not comprise a "note" or "mortgage" within the intendment of section 719 (a) (1), Internal Revenue Code, as to definition of borrowed invested capital.

1Opinion of the Court

Consolidated Goldacres Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Consolidated Goldacres Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 9248

United States Tax Court

8 T.C. 87; 1947 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 313;

January 21, 1947, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Petitioner, a Nevada corporation, entered into contracts for erection of mining machinery and plant. Title was retained by the seller until payment, in general dependent upon the amount of ore processed. Held, the contracts did not comprise a "note" or "mortgage" within the intendment of section 719 (a) (1),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Economy Sav. & Loan Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  2. Journal Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. Studebaker Bros. Co. of Utah v. WitcherNevada Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Faisst v. WaldoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Consolidated Goldacres Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API