Streit v. Kaiper
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the South-» ern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
The bill in this case was filed by the appellant for the purpose of obtaining a decree restraining the appellees from infringing the rights secured to him by letters patent No. ,668,268, issued February 19, 1901, upon an application filed October 2, 1899, for improvements in foot rests in chairs, and for damages and profits. The answer denied that there was invention in the device which was the subject of the patent, and also denied infringement. Upon the pleadings and proofs, the court at the hearing held the patent void for lack of invention, being of opinion that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Grant v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Thomas v. Rocker Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker Mfg. Co. v. Illinois Brass Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- D. J. Murray Mfg. Co. v. Sumner Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Clark v. Ace Rubber Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952