Ray Edward Gondron and Daniel Elchuk v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants seek reversal of their convictions for violations of 26 U.S.C.A. § 4744(a), 18 U.S.C.A. § 545 for importation, concealment and transportation, and transfer of marihuana. We need not pass on their contentions for the Government, by its motion here, agrees that a new trial should be granted and that the judgments ought not to stand because the convictions may have been tainted by the untrue and false testimony of a specified key witness.
The result is that the relief sought by the appellants, the reversal of the judgments, is granted as prayed for by each of them. Mesarosh v. United…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. D. Y. Dunn, United States of America v. Stanley W. Fizer and Bobbie Baum DarnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Ray Edward Gondron and Daniel Elchuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Daniel Elchuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Elchuk v. McCartyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
- United States v. GondronDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.