Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Altairi v. Alhaj

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1999No. Docket 203221Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Connell, J.

I agree with the majority that the trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition, and I concur in the reasoning and result the majority reaches in part n of its opinion. I respectfully part from the majority, however, in that where the majority declares that the trial court erred in finding the natural accumulation doctrine applicable to a licensee on private property and chooses instead to affirm the court’s decision by recourse to general principles of liability, I would affirm the learned trial judge’s application of the natural accumulation doctrine.

As the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Preston v. SleziakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Weider v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Anderson v. WiegandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Bard v. Weathervane of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API