Legal Opinion
Moses v. Eyman
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 26, 1969No. Civ. 69-242PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge.
Petitioner has filed herein a petition for writ of habeas corpus and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On June 4, 1969, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted and the respondent was ordered to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Pursuant to this order, the respondent has filed a response and a transcript of the state court proceedings. Petitioner has submitted a reply.
Petitioner was found to be guilty on three counts of the illegal sale of a narcotic drug after a jury trial in Arizona Superior Court,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Roberts v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin Prison v. Fred R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Anthony Marcella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Harold L. Gardner v. United States of America, Richard Green v. United States of America, George L. Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phegley v. GreerDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1980
- Isom Moses v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971