Legal Opinion

Erwin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; J. C. Roberts, Judge. Action by E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Company and others against T. R. Erwin and others. From a judgment for plaintiff and establishing the rights of defendants as between themselves, some of the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

The appellee Du Pont De Nemours Powder Company, a foreign corporation, sued Mitchell-Pigg Construction Company, W. J. Sparks, J. W. Pigg, H. F. Mitchell, M. D. Plumlee, W. H. Vardeman, A. S. Chapman, J. W. Braselton, and T. R. Erwin, as makers, and Will R. Allen, as indorser, of a negotiable promissory note in the sum of $5,904.05, payable to said Will R. Allen.

Appellee powder company, in the pleading upon which it went to trial, alleged that it acquired the note sued upon from Will R. Allen, the payee, before maturity for value, and without notice of any of the defenses subsequently set up…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Latham v. Houston Flour MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Barton v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Levy v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Dullnig v. Weekes, McCarthy & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. HollowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Waters v. Byers Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Maury-Cole Co. v. Lockhart Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Crews Williams v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API