Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Jose Valdivia-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2017No. 15-50384Published

1Concurrence

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring.

Although the result in this case is dictated by the case law of the Supreme Court and our Circuit, I write separately to highlight how it illustrates the bizarre and arbitrary effects of the ever-spreading categorical approach for comparing state law offenses to federal criminal definitions. I am hardly the first federal circuit judge, to express puzzlement at how the categorical approach has come to be applied. See, e.g., United States v. Doctor, 842 F.3d 306, 312 (4th Cir. 2016) (Wilkinson, J., concurring); United States v. Faust, 853 F.3d 39,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. FaustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API