Bhatti v. Roche
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should not be granted where there is any doubt about the existence of a triable issue of fact” (Sherman v Town of Rhinebeck, 133 AD2d 77, 78). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There exist triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants represented that the real property in question could be subdivided and whether, in fact, the real property in question may be subdivided. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sherman v. Town of RhinebeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lane v. McCallionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- County of Nassau v. BassenNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Fontana v. New Econo Laundromat Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- St. Barnabas Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 2017