Legal Opinion

In re Laguna

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2000No. 97-BG-1454PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends that respondent Francisco A. Laguna be disbarred as the result of his conviction of two crimes involving moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995). On April 20, 1995, respondent pled guilty to conspiracy to import cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 963(a), and obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Respondent concedes, and we agree, that these crimes involved moral turpitude per se. See In re Dechowitz, 741 A.2d 1061, 1061 (D.C.1999) (possession with intent to distribute is a crime of moral turpitude per se);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In Re DechowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re BlairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API