Legal Opinion
Tannehill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 30, 2003No. 3D02-1720PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
843 So.2d 355 (2003)
Eric TANNEHILL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-1720.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 30, 2003.
Eric Tannehill, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GODERICH, FLETCHER and WELLS, JJ.
2Per curiam
We affirm the trial court's denial of Appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus. "[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P." Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Leichtman v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Finley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Valdez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Owens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007