Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Murray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1913No. 3,317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; W. R. C. Stewart, Judge of the Ninth Judicial District, presiding. Action by A. W. Goldsmith, as executor of the last will and testament of Henry L. Frank, deceased, against James A. Murray. Judgment for defendant. ■ From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

*338This action was brought by H. L. Frank to recover a balance alleged to be due him on account of money paid out and expended for the use and benefit of the defendant at his special instance and request, between November 1, 1899, and September 2, 1903. Frank thereafter died and the executor of his will was substituted as plaintiff in his stead. In November, 1899, Frank and the defendant being the owners of the Gem quartz lode mining claim situate in Silver Bow county, the former of a three-fourths interest and the latter of the remaining interest, began to conduct mining operations thereon,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Boehme v. FitzgeraldMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dempster v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Galvin v. O'GormanMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Doll v. Hennessy Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dockins v. DockinsMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kenison v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Silver v. MorinMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Davey v. DaveyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Kelly v. McCabeMontana Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API