Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader

Unlike in Lenz v. Frank, Treas., 152 Ohio St., 153, 87 N. E. (2d), 578, court records, which the defendant Dougherty (the present holder of title to the real estate attached and sold in the instant case, who is herein referred to as the purchasing defendant) had an opportunity to examine, did not disclose what the statute required those records to disclose with regard to service by publication, i. e., a notation relative to mailing of a marked copy of the publication to the defendants Snader, who are herein referred to as the judgment debtors. Hence, it may be that the purchasing defendant…