Hack v. Sacramento City Junior College District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant district has appealed.
On the trial of the action considerable evidence was introduced without objection, which was outside of the issues made by the pleadings. In other words, the parties treated those subjects as being within the issues. In making findings, the trial court found on the issues made at the trial as well as those made by the pleadings. Such findings show the following facts:
Wilma L. Hack is a girl seventeen years of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ahern v. Livermore Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Consolidated School District No. 1 v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Shannon v. FleishhackerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Manwell v. Durst Bros.California Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Morris v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Buzzard v. East Lake School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Goodman v. Pasadena City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Perumean v. WillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.