State v. Fox
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court.- — HoN. W. S. Stookwell, Special Judge. (1) Tbe second count of tbe indictment is duplicitous distinct, inconsistent and repugnant offenses are charged therein. State v. Flint, 62 Mo. 393 ; State v. Huffman, 136 Mo. 65; State v. Shields, 8 Blackford (Ind.), 151; State v. Olavenger, 20 Mo. App. 628; State v. Bach, 25 Mo. App. ¡551; State v. Gibson, 111 Mo. 100; State v. Mah$n, 2 Ala. 340; King v. Stevens, 5 East 244; 1 Bishop on Grim.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court.- — HoN. W. S. Stookwell, Special Judge. (1) Tbe second count of tbe indictment is duplicitous distinct, inconsistent and repugnant offenses are charged therein. State v. Flint, 62 Mo. 393 ; State v. Huffman, 136 Mo. 65; State v. Shields, 8 Blackford (Ind.), 151; State v. Olavenger, 20 Mo. App. 628; State v. Bach, 25 Mo. App. ¡551; State v. Gibson, 111 Mo. 100; State v. Mah$n, 2 Ala. 340; King v. Stevens, 5 East 244; 1 Bishop on Grim. Proc.. (3 Ed.), secs. 489-492; State v. Bridges, 24 Mo. 353; State v. Meyers, '99 Mo, 114. (2) The offenses or…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
Defendant was convicted in the circuit court of Chariton county at its April term, 1898, and his punishment fixed at two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, for having at said county feloniously dug up, disinterred and removed the dead body and remains of a human being from the grave in which it was interred,for the purpose ■of dissection, surgical and anatomical experiment, and preparation. He appeals.
The case was here on a former occasion [State v. Fox, 136 Mo. 139], to which reference may be had for a statement of the facts. The judgment was then reversed and the ■cause remanded upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The People v. . PlathNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- People v. BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- State v. AdlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LentzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- State v. NieuhausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- State v. BobbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.