State v. Uriguen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The sole point for our consideration in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in suppressing evidence which was, admittedly, illegally seized, upon a finding that, as a matter of law, the exclusionary rule applies to probation revocation proceedings under Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution as amended in 1983. This court has recently so held, relying upon State v. Dodd, 419 So.2d 333 (Fla.1982): Mendiola v. State, 490 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State v. Pearson, 476 So.2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) as have the second and fourth districts. Cross v. State, 469 So.2d 226 (Fla.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DoddSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Tamer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Cross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Mendiola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985