Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Abeln

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2004No. WD 62180Published

1DissentHarold L. Lowenstein, Judge

I respectfully dissent and would reverse and remand solely on the issue that the officer had reasonable cause to stop Abeln for a traffic violation.

The only evidence presented to the trial court was contained in a document executed by both sides titled “STIPULATED FACTS REGARDING VEHICLE STOP,” and was prefaced by language that the parties agreed “that Trooper Steve Wilhoit would testify as follows ...” A stipulation as to the testimony of an absent witness would give if he or she were present at trial is not an admission of the truth of the testimony. Howard v. Mo. State Bd. of Educ., 847…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API