King v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff demonstrated her entitlement to enter judgment against the defendant upon the defendant’s failure to appear or answer the complaint by submitting proof of service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant, proof of a viable cause of action, and proof of the defendant’s failure to appear or answer (see CPLR 105 [u]; 3215 [f]; Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 70 [2003]; A & J Concrete Corp. v Arker, 54 NY2d 870, 872 [1981]; Triangle Props. # 2, LLC v Narang, 73 AD3d 1030, 1032 [2010]; Mercury Cas. Co. v Surgical Ctr. at Milburn, LLC, 65 AD3d 1102 [2009]).
To avoid…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- A & J Concrete Corp. v. ArkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hatton v. GasslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gershman v. AhmadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Diederich v. WetzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. AlbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Josovich v. CeylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Diederich v. WetzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.