Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARK ZAVISLAK, Case No. 5:21-cv-01811-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 v. AMEND ORDER; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR 11 NETFLIX, INC., RECONSIDERATION 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 239, 240 13 This case arises out of Plaintiff Mark Zavislak’s (“Zavislak”) allegation that Zavislak’s 14 health and wellness benefits plan administrator, Defendant Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”), failed to 15 timely furnish upon request all documents required under the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hemphill v. Estate of RyskampDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Barling v. UEBT Retiree Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Mineral County v. Walker River Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021