Legal Opinion
Marten v. Brown
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 28, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 143.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court ivas delivered by
G-uirMERE, Curar’ Justice.
This suit ivas originally began in the Second District Court of Jersey City. The plaintiff sued for damages for the breach of the following contract which was made a part of the state of demand: “Whereas Rudolph Marten has refused to complete his carpenter labor contract at Nos. 64-66-68 Triers avenue on the ground that the walls and partitions are irregular and crooked, and that to perform said work and complete said work on account of the above-named defects will cost $350 above the contract price, I herewith in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Laurino Co., Inc. v. Daly Building Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Mascola v. MascolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- International Dye & Print Works v. Fashion Screen Printing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.