Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Hendrickson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 26, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson District Court. Action to recover specific personal property. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

1. contract : rescission: iiuua. — The plaintiff’s husband is insane, and a guardian for his estate had been appointed previous to the transaction out of which this action arose. The facts, so far as necessary to be stated, are that de'endant claimed the estate of plaintiff’s husband was indebted to him in the sum of about one hundred and twenty-nine dollars, and he applied to plaintiff to pay the same. She, at the time, had in her possession the property in controversy, which belonged to her husband at the time he became insane. After some controversy, as defendant claims, the plaintiff…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. O'Brien v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. State v. ConwellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dillon v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API