State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Progressive Marathon Insurance
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appellant, and Progressive Marathon Insurance Company, respondent, filed cross-summary-judgment motions on stipulated facts concerning the parties’ respective obligations under automobile liability insurance policies. The trial court granted summary judgment to Progressive. The appeal presents purely a question of law, namely, whether Insurance Code section 11580.9, subdivision (d) governs the parties’ allocation of responsibility for uninsured motorist coverage. We conclude that, xyhile the statute does encompass uninsured…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Progressive Marathon Ins.California Supreme Court · 2007