Haynes v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
This action, brought by plaintiff, Reginald Haynes, is to recover for injuries he suffered when he was involved in a 3-car collision with the defendants,.William Moore and Donald Pitsch. The accident occurred on the Columbia River bridge approximately 25 feet south of the Washington-Oregon border.
The case was tried to a jury, pursuant to the Oregon comparative negligence statute. 1 Plaintiff was found 50 percent negligent, Moore 40 percent negligent, and Pitsch 10 percent negligent. Under the Oregon law, a plaintiff may not recover damages if he is found more negligent than the defendants.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Bartlett v. HantoverWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Balandzich v. DemerotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Zook v. BaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stewart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Lamborn v. Phillips Pacific Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Reager Ex Rel. Reager v. AndersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Blodgett v. Olympic Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.