Freeman v. Coleman, Ray & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Married women. Principal and surety. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
By an equitable petition Mrs. Freeman sought to set aside and cancel a mortgage and certain' notes and a draft which she had given to Coleman, Ray & Co., on the ground that she was a married woman at the time of the execution of these papers and signed them merely as surety or guarantor for her sister, Mrs. Moughon. By their answer, the defendants alleged that Mrs. Freeman did not contract as surety or guarantor for her sister, but as an original undertaker, to whom alone they extended the credit. It appears from the record that Mrs. Moughon obtained the benefit of the goods…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. HinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Shoup v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Finch v. BarclaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Lovelady v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Wilson Bros. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.