Legal Opinion
Booze v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 1974No. 73-830, 73-831, 73-832, 73-833 and 73-834PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
291 So.2d 262 (1974)
Gary W. BOOZE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 73-830, 73-831, 73-832, 73-833 and 73-834.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 8, 1974.
Rehearing Denied April 3, 1974.
Guillermo A. Ruiz and Philip J. Padovano, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Baya Harrison, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
MANN, Chief Judge.
An admittedly sufficient affidavit resulted in the issuance of a search warrant in which the description of the premises to be searched and the property to be seized were not stated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sidney Harrison Moore v. United States of America, Reuben William Moore, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Frederick L. KayeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Bloom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Joyner v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GamageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. WoratzeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Pezzella v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- State v. CarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.