Legal Opinion

Woody v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Designating the parties as they stood in the trial court, plaintiffs and defendant are coterminous owners of lands in King William county.

This is a statutory proceeding, Code, section 5490, brought to ascertain and fix their division line. That line originally ran with Manquin creek, and still runs with it unless the course of the creek itself has changed.

Plaintiffs hold by inheritance from their father, J. M. Abrams, Sr., who took title by deed from R. V. Florence, special commissioner, appointed in the cause of Ida B. Blake et al. v. Mary E. Lincoln et al., lately pending in the Circuit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Oliver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brauer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API