Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leimbach v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 1959No. [No. 114, September Term, 1958.]Published

1Dissent

*450Hammond, J.,

filed the following dissenting opinion, in which Prescott, J., concurred.

I do not challenge the proposition that an owner of property may himself negotiate with, and sell to, a prospect brought to him by a broker, without having to pay commissions in either of two situations—if he has previously terminated the authority of the broker in good faith or if the broker has voluntarily abandoned the undertaking. The owner cannot escape commissions if he discharged, the broker in bad faith to avoid payment of commissions, or if he wrongly compelled or induced the broker to withdraw.

I…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Richards v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Steele v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Goodman v. Marcol, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API