Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Marshall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1897No. 7396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hare, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In the petition in this case it was alleged that on September 10, 1888, “Charles C. Bullock and W. E. Keys, doing business at Lincoln, Nebraska, under the firm name of Keys & Bullock, were indebted” to certain named parties in various stated sums evidenced as to each indebtedness by a promissory note or notes; “that to secure such indebtedness said Keys & Bullock did, on the 10th day of September, 1888, make, execute, and deliver to the parties” creditors a chattel mortgage upon and covering, with other property, certain enumerated articles of personal property, including a stone crusher or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. GriffithNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Scott v. ChopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Denise v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Altschuler v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Issitt v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Thayer CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Zimmerman v. LindbladNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Manley State Bank v. SpanglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Scofield v. HaskellNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Walters v. Village of ExeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API